Current web client is too slow and cumbersome by today's standards.
Just have a look at the clean clients from the competing products like Varonis, Kiteworks, Egnyte. Even NextCloud.
Just to name a few problems:
- When navigating the files and folders, all page except the header seems to reload every time. Users see a white page and then the content, even when they are just opening a folder or moving to the next page; and what about those "null.html" and "empty.html"?
- General style is not very modern looking (too much detail at the icons, too much padding).
- If you resize the window making it narrower, widgets on the top right (where the username is) will be on top of the icons (pages are non responsive)
- If you share a file with an external user, they will see "My Files", "NetFolders", "Shared by Me" and all that stuff even if they just have access to the "Shared with Me" content
- If you go to "Shared by Me" the "delete" button looks like it will delete the share, but really deletes the file
- If you go to the download client page the size is fixed and will overflow the browser window if the client has a small resolution.
- Java dependencies, even if it is a web start, is a no-no in today's apps
I heard there will be a revamp of the interfaces on Filr "Quark". Hope you will consider some of these ideas.
by: Ricardo D. | over a year ago | Web Client
Comments
The Web client is ok, but could definitely benefit from a revamp to become more user-friendly. Just to name a few:
-We don't like the fact that an external users sees Netfolders, My Files and Shared by me, even if he doesn't have access permission to any folder within those trees.
-Same for Share, Copy Link or Email Link using Filr. Don’t show these buttons, when the user doesn’t have a right to share the file, or the folder by link.
-Also hide the “View Trash” option for Netfolders
-For external users, there should be a “big” or easy to locate download button (for folders or within a folder for multiple files). At the moment, they have to search for it under the “More” button.
-If a user clicks on a single image file, the image opens on a new tab on a plain white page, the user then has to rightclick the picture to save it. Here, an image gallery with a download button would be more user friendly, especially when there are a lot of images or movies in a folder.
-Language for first time visitors (external users) should be determined by their browser language.
-Files that are located on a network share will show the user _filesyncagent as the author. Better leave it blank in that case, as this sometimes confuses our users.
-There should be a customizable popup for new users, where admins could write a short text on how to change the language, where to find the windows client or where to find the documentation.
-Also a very small thing I noticed during user training is, that lots of users try to click on the folder icon and not on the folder name.
Great inputs Ricardo & Adrian!
Yes, we plan to revamp the UI in Quark. Will consider all of these when doing so.
Hi All,
We have started the work to revamp the Filr Web Client (and other clients + Admin interface.
The team wants to gather more feedback from some of our top users/customers and thus wanted to check if you would be able to find some time for this?
They would like to do a 40 to 60 minutes interview over a web session so that you/your-users can show the issues and inputs to the team.
If you are interested and can find time: please send me a mail.
Thanks,
Dev
Will the new revamped web client be responsive?
Dear voters,
We are making good progress wrt implementing this idea in Filr's next release - version 4.1
As always - it would be great to have your feedback on this before we ship.
In case you are interested in joining the beta program - please fill up a short survey as at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BPSJCKL
Regards,
Dev
Hi All,
May be worth removing the images when you enter the existing Beta WEBCLIENT if you hit a folder that does not contain any folders or files.
Also the animated GIF might be worth changing to a timer or something more up to date if this is truly showing the time it takes to refresh the screen.
Thanks
Emilios Theori
Sky UK