Planned

48

Git Support in designer

by: Albert-Jan S. | over a year ago | Designer
Cast your vote or comment ...
return to idea list

I would really, really like to have support for GIT versioning in Identity Manager Designer.

by: Albert-Jan S. | over a year ago | Designer

Comments

  • This is a common request and is part of our roadmap.

    by: Tom B. | over a year ago

  • So, Idea gets marked as "Planned" then?

    by: Ben W. | over a year ago

  • Voting for git support in designer

    by: praveen m. | over a year ago

  • Please! We could use this today!

    by: Gail L. | over a year ago

  • Yes, no more Subversion!

    by: Bruce T. | over a year ago

  • +1 for git support in designer!

    by: Patrick S. | over a year ago

  • Git support in designer would really help. Please prioritize this.

    by: Nilay V. | over a year ago

  • Hello, we are phasing out SVN and need to integrate with Git. Any ETA on when this feature may be considered? thanks, Jamie

    by: Jamie W. | over a year ago

  • +1

    by: Patryk R. | over a year ago

  • +1

    by: Heikki E. | over a year ago

  • Given our focus on performance and reliability for the tool, we may not be able to deliver version control using GIT, replacing SVN, in the 4.8 time frame. What I would like to propose is while we work to replace SVN with GIT that we provide an incremental step of adding package control versioning using GIT. See IDEA#13882. Would this be a good temporary addition we could add in 4.8 time frame?

    https://ideas.microfocus.com/MFI/identity-manager/Idea/Detail/13882

    by: Tom B. | over a year ago

  • +1

    by: Wikash D. | over a year ago

  • Hi Guys - I've had a look at the git support in 4.8 now, and what is there is great. What isn't there is the assembly... Can git be extended to describe the make-up of the driver-set and the driver, and not just do packages.

    If I want to build a POC replica of prod (for example).. I have to manually define and create the driver-set, each driver, ALL GCVs that aren't default values from the packages, and then assoc each package to each driver. That is a boat load of manual work that is not recorded anywhere, and any CI/CD solution would be completely ad-hoc at each customers site.

    Am I wrong? I am missing something ?

    by: Alex P. | over a year ago